Murray Sabrin Is The Best Thing To Happen To Bob Menendez

Murray Sabrin

Murray Sabrin

Murray Sabrin strikes again!

Stockton University released a poll today that shows the U.S. Senate race between Bob Hugin and U.S. Senator Bob Menendez a dead heat with Menendez leading Hugin 45-43 percent and Sabrin polling at 3 percent.

Back in August we explained in this blog that Murray Sabrin has spent his entire political career screwing up Republicans. Without Sabrin in this race Hugin would be on top of Menendez, still within the margin of error, but leading.

According to the Stockton University poll:

Hugin is receiving 88 percent of Republican support and just 3 percent from Democrats. Menendez is receiving 80 percent of Democrat support, but 9 percent from Republicans. Independents are supporting Hugin over Menendez by a 4-to-3 margin.

One issue for Menendez: 14 percent of Democrats are undecided or say they will vote for a candidate other than Hugin or Sabrin. A challenge for the incumbent is to convince those Democrats to back their party’s candidate.

Democrats who don’t want to vote for Menendez aren’t voting for Hugin or Sabrin. Obviously, that means Sabrin is pulling Republican voters from the Republican in the race, continuing his tradition of screwing things up for the GOP. Sabrin has about as much a chance of winning this Senate election as does Natalie Rivera. Why can’t his supporters see that? “Or some other candidate” is polling better than Sabrin. Sabrin cannot possibly believe he has a chance of winning this race.

This is not an election where Republicans have the luxury of voting for some fringe candidate, including Sabrin, because the party nominee doesn’t align with them 100%. They need to get on board with Hugin or Menendez will be sending a birthday present to Sabrin in December.

Here’s hoping Sabrin can somehow be stopped from screwing things up for Republicans again.

Grossman Campaign Ad Stirs Controversy Among Democrats Statewide, But It’s Not Why You Think

Controversy.jpg

Sometimes North Jersey politics work their way into South Jersey. On occasion it goes the other way. Now it appears the Grossman campaign’s first TV ad is creating a little bit of controversy among Democrats.

Truth be told, it’s a good ad that ties Democratic congressional candidate state Senator Jeff Van Drew to Senate President Steve Sweeney. Years ago, I did a similar ad and mail campaign that referred to the “Sweeney-Corzine Trenton Tax Team.” I still remember Sweeney, then the Gloucester County Freeholder Director and state Senator, thanking me for giving him top billing. That conversation told me it bothered him at least a little bit, so I doubled down. The difference, at least according to Democrats I’ve talked to over the last several days, is that my ad and mail was in a campaign against Sweeney.

Fast forward to the Grossman ad. The grumbling in some circles within the Democratic party are that North Bergen Mayor, state Senator and Hudson County political boss Nick Sacco is somehow involved in this ad.

I blew this suggestion off the first time I heard it, the second time I listened a little, but I received a third call, so I listened, and there is a compelling argument, or at the very least a good conspiracy theory and definitely some controversy. That led me to make more phone calls.

For South Jerseyans who pay little attention to North Jersey politics you need to understand Sacco and Sweeney aren’t exactly best friends. The Jersey Journal’s Agustin “Augie” Torres put it into perspective in a column back in June. Torres wrote, in part (and misspelled Wainstein):

Oh yeah, and should the younger DeGise suffer a slaughter, the elder will still have to run - to continue depleting resources that may otherwise be used in the North Bergen May election against the incumbent administration.

Sources say money will not be a problem when it comes to the North Bergen election. South Jersey Democrats - read that as insurance guy George Norcross and Senate President Steve Sweeney -- so despise Sacco that you can expect to see a super Political Action Committee (PAC) pop up with $1 million available just to make certain there's a new mayor in North Bergen, say sources.

Larry Weinstein 's school board race went poorly but he still aspires to replace Sacco in Township Hall. You can't always translate school political success to a municipal race. In the last municipal election Weinstein received 5,000 votes. How much of an impact was that vote total? Ask yourself what would be Stack's reaction if he gave up 5,000 votes? It would be seismic.

In the present atmosphere it would not be difficult to come up with another 2,000 votes or more in anti-Sacco votes.

Of course, those of you who pay little attention to North Jersey politics need another piece of the puzzle. That piece of the puzzle is that the Grossman campaign’s ad was put together by political strategist and pollster Rick Shaftan. Shaftan is known for his work with Republicans, but he also happens to be North Bergen Mayor Nick Sacco’s guy. Shaftan is Sacco's pollster, media buyer, and produces videos highlighting the North Bergen DPW's snow removal efforts.

It appears there are more than a few folks who travel in Democratic party circles who believe Sacco convinced Shaftan to mention Sweeney in the Grossman ad as a way to soften Sweeney up. The reason for this is many Democrats in Hudson County believe Sweeney is going to align with Larry Wainstein when he runs against Sacco (again) for Mayor of North Bergen in May.

Remember, I ran similar anti-Sweeney ads many years ago. I mention that again because I want to be clear I have no issue with the ad, no issue with Shaftan and I am a Grossman supporter. Again, I think it’s a good ad. With that said, the Sacco – Sweeney feud does add another dynamic to the scuttlebutt.

Adding a little more fuel to the fire is that more than one Hudson County Democrat has told me that Wainstein has offered to send ground troops into CD2 for Van Drew. Sacco’s opponent in the next mayoral campaign offering assistance to Van Drew does add to the controversy.

One source close to the Governor told me Phil Murphy is happy with the ad because he feels it hurts Sweeney.

The connections are enough to have created controversy among Democrats up and down the Turnpike. Controversy over an ad from a Republican congressional campaign.

The fact that a Hudson County nonpartisan mayoral race between two Democrats is spilling over into a South Jersey congressional race is just one of the things that makes New Jersey politics fun to watch.

And, because it is likely George Norcross and Sweeney are going to get behind Wainstein in the North Bergen mayoral race there is a South Jersey connection, so we’re going to keep our eyes on that race and this new controversy in CD2.

The Hypocrisy Of Lt. Governor Oliver, Sen. Weinberg And First Lady Murphy Was On Display Yesterday

hypocrisy.jpg

Yesterday, Lieutenant Governor Sheila Oliver, state Senator Loretta Weinberg and New Jersey’s First Lady Tammy Murphy issued a press release denouncing Congressman Leonard Lance over comments he made about Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.

Apparently, Oliver, Weinberg and Murphy have a problem with the fact that Lance said he “tends not to believe” Blasey Ford. Of course, they have a problem with what Lance said, he’s a Republican. Make no mistake, their real problem is that Lance is a Republican.

I might believe Oliver, Weinberg and Murphy had a real problem with what Lance said if any of the three had ever uttered a public word when men who happen to be Democrats mistreated women.

Have Oliver, Weinberg or Murphy ever said a word about U.S. Senator Bob Menendez helping to bring young women into the country for his pal Salomen Melgen? Don’t forget, Menendez’s lawyers “conceded that the senator intervened on his pal’s behalf” when it came to the young women getting into the country. One could argue that helping a dirty old man play sugar daddy to young women is a form of sexual abuse. It is apparent Oliver, Weinberg nor Murphy would agree with that argument based on their silence over Menendez helping Melgen play sugar daddy.

How about when we learned Governor Phil Murphy’s soccer team forced women to live with an elderly man who repeatedly made inappropriate comments to the players and made them feel uncomfortable. Did Oliver, Weinberg or Murphy speak out about the governor’s soccer team forcing women to tolerate sexual harassment? Nope!

Their silence on the documented mistreatment of women by people associated with Menendez and Gov. Murphy makes Oliver, Weinberg and Mrs. Murphy hypocrites. They definitely lack any credibility to speak out on this issue.