Three Congressmen Held A Press Conference To Complain President Trump Is Doing Exactly What He Said He Would Do

Apparently, Congressmen Bill Pascrell Jr., Frank Pallone Jr., and Donald Payne Jr. held a press conference to complain the Trump administration is “continuing to withhold almost $6 million in law enforcement grants.”

Well, duh, you were warned this would happen to “sanctuary cities and states.” Don’t take our word for it, read it here, here and here.

Now the congressmen want to complain something happened that they were told was going to happen? Sounds like more fake Democratic outrage.

Congressman Pascrell Jr. said at the press conference, “No one should ever play politics with our law enforcement, but this is exactly what Donald Trump and [Attorney General] Jeff Sessions are doing.”

But, that’s exactly what “sanctuary cities and states” are doing, playing politics with law enforcement. The “sanctuary” jurisdictions make us all less safe. Why have these congressmen not complained about “sanctuary cities and states” not obeying the law, in essence playing politics with law enforcement?

So, no Mr. Pascrell, you and your sanctuary loving friends are the ones playing politics with law enforcement.

Congressman Payne Jr. upped the ante complaining, “By forcing a false choice between abandoning our immigrant community or receiving federal law enforcement grants, the Trump administration has hurt every single New Jerseyan.”

Payne Jr. is plain wrong, there is no false choice, either follow the rules or don’t and “sanctuary cities and states” choose not to follow the rules. As children we are taught that if you don’t follow the rules you get punished. In other words, don’t complain if you get punished for breaking the rules. Especially if you were repeatedly warned of the consequences.

Making the claim the immigrant community is being abandoned is bogus. My legal immigrant neighbor and her children are doing just fine. By all appearances my neighbor’s illegal immigrant boyfriend is doing pretty good too, he was even arrested for attacking someone with a knife two years ago, held in a county jail in south Jersey, released and he’s still here, ILLEGALLY. My legal immigrant landlord is doing pretty good too, he owns and rents out 8 different homes.

Please Mr. Payne, spare me the immigrant community is being abandoned line because they aren’t.

Basically, the press conference held by Congressmen Bill Pascrell Jr., Frank Pallone Jr., and Donald Payne Jr. the other day can be summed up as they asked why Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions are doing exactly what they said they would do and the answer is for the congressmen to tell their sanctuary loving friends to follow the rules.

State Senator Loretta Weinberg Joins The Ranks Of Bob Menendez Loving Hypocrites

Loretta Weinberg

In a story New Jersey’s Democrats don’t want to let go, today State Senator Loretta Weinberg joined the ranks of Menendez Loving Hypocrites when she issued a statement regarding Republican senatorial candidate Bob Hugin and Princeton’s eating clubs.

Regurgitating more of the same anti-Hugin garbage Senator Weinberg said in her statement, “The revelation that U.S. Senate candidate Bob Hugin fought to exclude women from Princeton’s prominent eating clubs should make residents of New Jersey, men and women alike, angry.”

She said a bunch of other stuff too, all proving that with age does not come wisdom. Or perhaps it simply proves she forgot about the guy she supports, Bob Menendez, scandalous past and that she told a reporter, “It’s a distraction.” Sure, allegedly having sex with under-aged prostitutes in the Dominican Republic was “distracting.”

At least one of the prostitutes who claimed she had sex with Menendez recanted, then again, the prostitute who recanted was not the original prostitute to make the claim according to a published report. So, maybe Weinberg is confused. Who knows?

One fact about Menendez and his scandalous past is clear: Even his own lawyers conceded the fact that Bob Menendez helped bring Salomen Melgen’s girlfriends into the country.

Of course, Loretta Weinberg was silent on the issue of Menendez helping bring a dirty old man’s sugar babies into the country and she still chooses to ignore that fact. She also chooses to ignore that Menendez was once anti-gay rights when he cast his vote for the Defense of Marriage Act. Basically, Weinberg has joined the ranks of the only Democrats can change their views crowd.

Welcome to the world of Bob Menendez loving hypocrites Senator Weinberg. Hopefully, in the future voters will remember what a giant hypocrite you are.

Bob Menendez And The NJ Democrats Outrage At Bob Hugin’s Past Is Fake. Here’s Why:

Sen. Bob Menendez

New Jersey Democrats have been trying to beat the crap out of Bob Hugin over his past association with the Tiger Inn eating club at Princeton.

Menendez’s campaign chairman went so far as to say Hugin has a “disdain for women.” and went on to claim, “Bob Hugin was in a position to show real leadership on advancing the causes of women and the LGBTQ community and failed.” The fact then-Congressman Menendez voted for the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 seemed to have escaped his campaign chairman. 15 years later Menendez supported repealing the Act – in other words his views changed, but in the world of New Jersey’s Democrats only they can change their views.

Apparently, Menendez forgot his views changed too, saying to the New Jersey Globe, “He stopped women, or attempted to stop them, from joining the eating clubs of Princeton at a time when the nation made great progress, but evidently they didn’t make progress with him.”

Unfortunately for Menendez that argument makes no sense. Hugin’s Tiger Inn battles appear to have ended in 1992 (the court case in 1991) yet it was 1996 when Menendez voted to deny federal benefits to gay couples. So, in in 1991 – 1992 the nation made great progress and Hugin was wrong then why four years later did Menendez cast his vote to discriminate against gay couples? By his own logic gay couples didn’t make progress with Menendez in 1996.

Menendez is also quoted as saying, “This is not the indiscretion of a young guy who may have been misguided at the time, he was in his thirties, I was fighting for women when I was in my thirties. I wasn’t discriminating against the LGBTQ community, I was fighting for them.”

The question has to be asked, how was Menendez fighting for the LGBTQ community in his thirties when at the age of 42 he voted for the Defense of Marriage Act? This time the Senator’s argument is worse than not making sense, it appears to be untrue.

As to Menendez’s claim that he was fighting for women. Come on, Menendez’s own lawyers conceded that the senator intervened on Salomen Melgen’s behalf when it came to getting Melgen’s young girlfriends into the country. Getting young women into the country for their sugar daddy doesn’t sound like someone who has been fighting for women.

Given that Senator Menendez does have a past of voting to discriminate against gay couples and a past of aiding a sugar daddy in his efforts to bring young women into the country his, and the NJ Democrats, outrage at Bob Hugin’s past is completely fake.